Coliving vs. cohousing - What is the difference?

In recent times, alternative living models such as cohousing and coliving have gained traction, offering innovative ways to foster social connection and support. While the concept of cohousing dates back to the 1960s in Denmark, coliving has emerged as a hybrid between cohousing and rental apartments. Both models cater to different demographics and preferences, with cohousing communities typically featuring privately-owned units and shared common spaces, while coliving spaces offer rented, furnished units managed by a company.

Numerous studies have highlighted the health benefits of living in cohousing and coliving communities, including improved mental and physical health. Residents often experience less depression, anxiety, and eating disorders than those living in traditional neighborhoods. A key factor contributing to these positive outcomes is the easy access to social support from neighbors, which can significantly enhance an individual's overall quality of life.

Cohousing communities foster a culture of neighborliness, with shared resources and a genuine willingness to help one another. In these communities, neighbors care for each other without being prompted, providing a strong sense of belonging and support. The Public Health Reviews paper further emphasizes these benefits, as eight out of ten studies analyzed found positive associations between cohousing and mental health.

Real-life experiences in cohousing communities, such as the story of Alan O'Hashi, demonstrate the power of community support during challenging times. When Alan fell seriously ill, his cohousing neighbors stepped up without hesitation, providing meals and assistance. This sense of unity and willingness to help is at the heart of cohousing communities.

Comparing coliving and cohousing, it is essential to understand the differences in terminology and living arrangements. Coliving is a residential model that accommodates three or more unrelated people sharing a dwelling, often with shared values or intentions. In contrast, cohousing provides self-contained private units and ownership by individual residents, with shared areas for events or communal meals.

Ultimately, the human need for social interaction is undeniable, and living in isolation for extended periods can have detrimental effects on both physical and mental health. Both coliving and cohousing models aim to address this need by creating supportive, community-driven environments that foster social connections and enhance overall well-being.

When choosing between coliving and cohousing, personal preferences and lifestyle needs play a crucial role in determining the best fit. It is essential to weigh the pros and cons of each living model and consider factors such as privacy, shared spaces, decision-making processes, and rental or ownership options.

As these alternative living models continue to gain popularity, it is evident that terms like coliving and cohousing are here to stay. Embracing these concepts and understanding their distinctions can help individuals make informed decisions about their living arrangements and, ultimately, enjoy the numerous benefits of being part of something bigger than themselves.

Both cohousing and coliving models offer unique approaches to fostering social connection and support in today's fast-paced world. By understanding their differences and evaluating personal preferences, individuals can find a living arrangement that meets their needs and contributes positively to their mental, emotional, and physical well-being.